Add a rally, forum, town hall, or other event to collect RSVPs, give attendees directions and more.
Add events from your existing Ning or MeetUp groups to share with other FreedomConnector activists.
Let other FreedomConnector activists join your cause to mobilize for freedom!
VOTE NOW: What should Republicans' Top Legislative Priority Be?
Repeal the ObamaCare individual mandate
Stop the NSA's warrantless spying on Americans
Refuse to reauthorize the Import-Export Bank
Stop the ObamaCare bailouts of insurance companies
View poll and comments »
We MUST return the bible to our schools or continue to fail. The liberal mindset only offers opinions....these are facts!
The article is Impregnating America With Muslims, I wish all Americans would read this. Muslims know Violence on a scale most could never Fathom. And soon they will bring there brand of Violence to your neighborhood. They are parasites that live to destroy cultures around the world, So this article reminds us why the must leave and take there sheep with them!!.
The article is Impregnating America With Muslims, I wish all Americans would read this. Muslims know Violence on a scale most could never Fathom. And soon they will bring there brand of Violence to your neighborhood. They are parasites that live to destroy cultures around the world, So this article reminds us why the must leave and take there sheep with them!!. http://www.newswithviews.com/wooldridge/...
Many center-right bloggers, pundits, activists, voters, experts, consultants, elected officials and public opinion leaders constantly claim Barack Obama is out of his league, unable to cope with big decisions and generally incompetent. Charles Krauthammer, for example, is often considered a leading mind of intellect and is a regular on various Fox News shows. Krauthammer is one of the leading advocates for the assertion that Obama is incompetent and has no clue what he's doing.
Really? Are we all to believe Obama is accidentally aiding our enemies while crushing freedom and potential for prosperity here at home?
Think about this. Obama is often touted as a genius negotiator when it comes to getting what he wants from a GOP controlled Congress. In virtually every instance since Republicans took control in 2010, Obama has gotten everything he wanted with his agenda. Debt ceiling hike? Not a problem. Radical permission to spy on Americans? No biggie. Funding for unconstitutional executive amnesty? Yep. Funding for Obamacare, even though almost every single Republican ran against it? You bet.
Yet, when it comes to negotiating with our enemies, Obama is touted as being a terrible negotiator. There was the horrendous Bergdahl swap, for example, and now the Cuba disaster.
Which is it? Is he brilliant or an idiot? Is he a good negotiator or a terrible one?
Instead of changing our answers depending on what Obama does each day, why don't we look at simple patterns.
Obama's domestic agenda is to oppose individual liberty, prop up big banks, loot the taxpayers, spend us into permanent financial oblivion, militarize our domestic law enforcement, create global racial tension and general society division, break apart moral foundations and help destroy the traditional family. When it comes to foreign policy, Obama is placing each and every single American working overseas in direct harm by announcing to the world if you hold an American hostage, you'll eventually get what you want.
You'll get what you want, even it if means we give you multiple high ranking terrorist officers in exchange for a deserter. You'll get what you want, even if it means we give you convicted spies in return for an American contractor.
This happens while Obama's foreign policy creates a direct move of aggression against Russia. One that could result in Russian aggression against the rest of the world.
This happens while Obama arms terrorist groups across the middle east, all of whom wish to destroy Israel. (And America)
When you look at everything written above, can you not easily conclude Obama is actively working against the American people and for our enemies? And by definition, wouldn't that make the President, the most powerful man in the world, an enemy of the state?
And if you accept that definition, don't you wonder why not a single member of the House or Senate will call it for what it is?
Food for thought.
“I want to be clear: the American forces that have been deployed to Iraq do not and will not have a combat mission.”
That’s what President Obama told troops at an Air Force base in Florida this past September after he had ordered U.S. military “advisers” back into Iraq. It was one of several times that Obama publicly declared that his “no boots on the ground” policy in the country besieged by ISIS would definitely keep American forces from being involved in combat there.
Despite some of his top military commanders suggesting that U.S. military personnel might have to resume fighting in Iraq, the president was adamant, pledging repeatedly that the thousands of “advisers, trainers and security personnel” he ordered to Iraq would not become involved in the shooting.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/breakin...
Some say the definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and expect different results. So with that being said, some are applauding President Obama’s unilateral change in policy towards Cuba — by way of opening up diplomatic relations.
Now, we can debate the pros and cons, but the underlying problem I have with all of this is why was this not discussed openly?
Why was it that once again we surrendered three Cuban spies with blood on their hands? Yes, we’re all happy Alan Gross is home. But we’re seeing a repeat of the SGT Bowe Bergdahl swap for five senior Taliban leaders. We seem to be operating from a position of appeasement, acquiescence, and weakness — not of strength. And what message does this send? Shall we now fear that Americans will be regularly kidnapped in order to be used as negotiating chips for the release of nefarious criminals being held here in America?
And one thing I need to say up front. Folks keeps saying Pope Francis approved of the policy change. Well, U.S. foreign relations and national security are not subservient to the whims and desires of the Vatican and the Pontiff. I appreciate his perspective, but his input shouldn’t be considered a seal of approval or provide cover for the Obama administration. Anyway, where are those folks who always complain about the separation of church and state??
Your support keeps freedom alive!