Add a rally, forum, town hall, or other event to collect RSVPs, give attendees directions and more.
Add events from your existing Ning or MeetUp groups to share with other FreedomConnector activists.
Let other FreedomConnector activists join your cause to mobilize for freedom!
VOTE NOW: What should Republicans' Top Legislative Priority Be?
Repeal the ObamaCare individual mandate
Stop the NSA's warrantless spying on Americans
Refuse to reauthorize the Import-Export Bank
Stop the ObamaCare bailouts of insurance companies
View poll and comments »
ANARCHAST: JUDGE NAPOLITANO: A ROTHBARDIAN ANARCHIST ON RAND PAUL AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICA!
Published on Apr 15, 2015
[Judge Napolitano speaks on how most all the founding fathers embraced these ideas. The video is 22 minutes but well worth watching]
Jeff Interviews famous TV personality Judge Napolitano, topics include: First principles, the individual is greater than the state, the inviolability of the non aggression principle, getting America back to freedom, the 8th amendment, Rand Paul, is he as libertarian as his father? The popularity of private judges, serious libertarian views entering the mainstream thanks to Ron Paul, the excesses of presidency, Suicide Pact - the book.
22 minute video https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=103&v=jP...
9th Amendment - Unenumerated Rights
In discussions we often hear people talk about the 10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
But what does this mean to you? The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Did you realize this is the 9th Amendment, the one just before "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
SO why do we not use the 9th more and what does it mean to you?
NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - In a key test of President Barack Obama's efforts to overhaul immigration law without congressional action, administration lawyers will on Friday ask a federal appeals court to lift an injunction blocking his executive action meant to help undocumented immigrants.
Issued in February by Texas-based U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen, the injunction halted programs unveiled in November intended to shield 4.7 million undocumented immigrants from deportation.
The programs angered many Republicans who accused the president of executive overreach and granting amnesty to lawbreakers, but drew praise from immigrant rights advocates.
Hundreds of pro-immigrant advocates are expected to rally in front of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals courthouse in New Orleans where arguments in the case are set to be heard.
On April 7, the Fifth Circuit ruled that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and the state of Mississippi lacked standing to sue over a separate immigration action issued by Obama in 2012 allowing immigrants brought to the United States as children to stay.
That decision may signal that the three-judge panel hearing arguments on Friday could be inclined to temporarily lift Hanen's injunction, some observers said, which would let the administration proceed with implementing the president's landmark immigration action.
In its published opinion, the court said it was "purely speculative" that Mississippi had sustained fiscal injury as a result of the 2012 action.
The 26 states that sued over Obama's November 2014 action made claims like those in Mississippi's case.
Still, it is unclear whether the administration will prevail in the Fifth Circuit, considered one of the most conservative courts in the country.
The Fifth Circuit is due to hear a full appeal later this year to permanently undo Hanen's decision in a case that could ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
(Reporting by Jonathan Kaminsky in New Orleans and Julia Edwards in Washington; Editing by Michael Perry)
Interesting. I am going to have to watch this one unfold. Odd that America is not an example?
The objective of the founders of the new state is to build a country where honest people can prosper without being oppressed by governments making their lives unpleasant through the burden of unnecessary restrictions and taxes. One of the reasons for founding Liberland is the ever expanding influence of interest groups on the functioning of existing states and the consequent worsening of living conditions of people. The founders are inspired by countries such as Monaco, Liechtenstein or Hong Kong.
Do you want to become a citizen of Liberland? Liberland is currently accepting applications for citizenship, which will be processed in due time.
Who is needed in Liberland?
Liberland currently needs people who:
- have respect for other people and respect the opinions of others, regardless of their race, ethnicity, orientation, or religion
-have respect for private ownership which is untouchable
-do not have communist, nazi or other extremist past
-were not punished for past criminal offences
[Judge Napolitano speaks on how most all the founding fathers embraced these ideas]
Your support keeps freedom alive!