Add a rally, forum, town hall, or other event to collect RSVPs, give attendees directions and more.
Add events from your existing Ning or MeetUp groups to share with other FreedomConnector activists.
Let other FreedomConnector activists join your cause to mobilize for freedom!
We as Americans are allowing the garb and we have to start speaking out.
It's pity for BHO ; He has help Muslm Brother to be in White House , but has a bad threat ? BHO should learn that behind ISIS there's Saud Arab Country leader ? We must suggest BHO not to near to the arabs , Don't we ?
Mississippi lawmakers this week said they want to designate the Bible as the state book. At least two bills are being filed during this state election year to make the holy book a state symbol. Rep. Miles told The Associated Press on Monday he's not trying to force religion — or even reading — on anyone. "The Bible provides a good role model on how to treat people," Miles said. "They could read in there about love and compassion…
In 2014, Republican Gov. Phil Bryant signed a law that adds "In God We Trust" to the state seal. Legislators also begin each workday with a prayer over the microphone at the front of the House and Senate chambers, frequently with references to Jesus. It's unlikely the proposal will generate much opposition in the Legislature this election year…" because the people of Mississippi respect and honor the Word of God. They are wise to do so even though the Associated Press and other mainstream media mock and demean them for doing so. It is a wise and perceptive people who honor the Word of God and seek to conform their own lives and the life of the community to the Word of God.
Following God's instruction book is always the wisest path in life, for this book is the book of life. You would be correct to understand that it is the owner's manual given to us by our Creator. Do you want to know how to live the right way, the way you were designed by your manufacturer? Here is the owner's manual that if you follow it will yield the blessings our Creator has prepared for us.
The founders of our land understood this as they undertook the task of creating a civil government that would enjoy the blessings of liberty.
Consider what the 2nd President of the United States, Signer of the Declaration of Independence, Member of the Continental Congress, Ambassador to France, First Ambassador to Great Britain John Adams wrote in his personal journal 2/22/1756. "Suppose a nation in some distant region should take the Bible for their only law book, and every member should regulate his conduct by the precepts there exhibited! Every member would be obliged in conscience, to temperance, frugality, and industry; to justice, kindness, and charity towards his fellow men; and to piety, love and reverence toward Almighty God...What a Eutopia, what a Paradise would this region be."
In contrast to that understanding is the attitude today. Nowadays many assert that the Word of God, if everyone obeyed it, would only bring sadness, misery and repression, not a blessing but a curse. Who has it right, our founders or the media, academia, and elite of our day?
I believe among the commandments of God the most rejected commandment of the Ten in our day is the Seventh Commandment, "Thou shalt not commit adultery." The lie that has been sold to our society is that obeying the Seventh is not in our best self-interest, but that to obey it is repressive, damaging and downright unhealthy.
Well let's look at what God's Word states in Proverbs 6. "My son, keep thy father's commandment, and forsake not the law of thy mother: Bind them continually upon thine heart, and tie them about thy neck. When thou goest, it shall lead thee; when thou sleepest, it shall keep thee; and when thou awakest, it shall talk with thee. For the commandment is a lamp; and the law is light; and reproofs of instruction are the way of life: To keep thee from the evil woman, from the flattery of the tongue of a strange woman. Lust not after her beauty in thine heart; neither let her take thee with her eyelids. For by means of a whorish woman a man is brought to a piece of bread: and the adulteress will hunt for the precious life. Can a man take fire in his bosom, and his clothes not be burned? Can one go upon hot coals, and his feet not be burned? So he that goeth in to his neighbour's wife; whosoever toucheth her shall not be innocent. Men do not despise a thief, if he steal to satisfy his soul when he is hungry; But if he be found, he shall restore sevenfold; he shall give all the substance of his house. But whoso committeth adultery with a woman lacketh understanding: he that doeth it destroyeth his own soul."
Where do you stand on this issue? Who will you serve? The world, which says, "if it feels good do it" or will you be faithful and serve the Lord and abide in His Word? "…As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD."
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/01/faithf...
Sheikh Muhammad Munajid, claimed the mouse is “one of Satan’s soldiers” and makes everything it touches impure, The Telegraph reports.  But he warned that like all devilish creatures depictions of the creature in cartoons such as Tom and Jerry, and Disney’s Mickey Mouse, had taught children that it was in fact loveable.   The cleric, a former diplomat at the Saudi embassy in Washington DC, said that under Sharia, both household mice and their cartoon counterparts must be killed.
Sheikh Muhammad Munajid, claimed the mouse is “one of Satan’s soldiers” and makes everything it touches impure, The Telegraph reports.  But he warned that like all devilish creatures depictions of the creature in cartoons such as Tom and Jerry, and Disney’s Mickey Mouse, had taught children that it was in fact loveable.   The cleric, a former diplomat at the Saudi embassy in Washington DC, said that under Sharia, both household mice and their cartoon counterparts must be killed. Mr Munajid was asked to give Islam’s teaching on mice during a religious affairs programme broadcast on al-Majd TV, an Arab television network. According to a translation prepared by the Middle East Media Research Institute, an American press monitoring service, he said: “The mouse is one of Satan’s soldiers and is steered by him. “If a mouse falls into a pot of food – if the food is solid, you should chuck out the mouse and the food touching it, and if it is liquid – you should chuck out the whole thing, because the mouse is impure. “According to Islamic law, the mouse is a repulsive, corrupting creature. How do you think children view mice today – after Tom and Jerry?   “Even creatures that are repulsive by nature, by logic, and according to Islamic law have become wonderful and are loved by children. Even mice.  Following is an excerpt from a religious program featuring Saudi Cleric Muhammad Al-Munajid, which aired on Al-Majd TV on August 27, 2008:
Muhammad Al-Munajid: What is the position of Islamic law with regard to mice? The Shari’a refers to the mouse as “little corrupter,” and says it is permissible to kill it in all cases. It says that mice set fire to the house, and are steered by Satan. The mouse is one of Satan’s soldiers and is steered by him. If a mouse falls into a pot of food – if the food is solid, you should chuck out the mouse and the food touching it, and if it is liquid – you should chuck out the whole thing. Because the mouse is i-m-p-u-r-e! 
According to Islamic law, the mouse is a repulsive, corrupting creature. How do you think children view mice today – after Tom and Jerry? Even creatures that are repulsive by nature, by logic, and according to Islamic law have become wonderful and are loved by children. Even mice. Mickey Mouse has become an awesome character, even though according to Islamic law, Mickey Mouse should be killed in all cases.      
But this may be easier said than done. Mickey has survived countless attempts on his life since he first appeared in the cartoon Steamboat Willie in 1928 while Jerry has been fending off Tom’s murderous attacks since 1940.  Mr Munajid is also the imam who condemned the Beijing Olympics as the “bikini Olympics”, claiming that nothing made Satan happier than seeing females athletes dressed in skimpy outfits.     Mickey may have survived the battle with the brooms in “Fantasia,” but now Mickey Mouse has to contend with Islam. 
WATCH THE PUTZ:
A Saudi cleric has condemned Disney’s lovable cartoon mouse. What could the big-eared rodent possibly have done to offend?  
And from Morocco, Myrtus is lost for words and exclaims:
Gasp! Stupidity beyond belief!  
And on the outcry from Western media, Sultan Al Jumeri, from Saudi Arabia, writes:
There is nothing new about the Western media, and particularly the American media, is ridiculing our Islamic doctrines and our culture in general. There are scores of programmes, books and movies which prove this! They have been available everywhere for a long period of time! Their history in tarnishing is not something new .. but something which goes back in time. 
Jordanian Mohammed Badi has another take on the issue and writes:
Because all the issues and problems facing Muslims have been solved thanks to the Almighty, we are now left with chasing after mice. It seems that Spiderman and Batman and Tom (and Jerry as well) should all be arrested. 
Still in Jordan, The Black Iris notes:
Well, it should be pointed out that I think the brief second of hesitation towards the end suggested the he was aware Mickey is a cartoon and so was being somewhat satirical about the killing of him. Because really, how do you kill a cartoon? Stop drawing it? […] Anyways, the western media has had a field day (week) with this bit of news…  
Global Voices Online Morocco author Jillian York gives us her take on the issue here. She notes:
Some Saudi cleric is answering a question about mice; namely, whether or not they should be killed in the house. It’s a valid religious question that anyone might consider (including PETA), but the cleric goes perhaps a little too far and claims that the presence Tom & Jerry has softened kids to the evils of mice. 
After watching the video, she explains:
It’s pretty clear to me that when he says “according to Islamic Sharia, Mickey Mouse should be killed,” he’s saying it with a smirk on his face and a tongue in his cheek. And yet the American media got ahold of the video (which was put out by MEMRI) and all hell breaks loose. 
And after linking to the media outlash, she observes:
Suddenly the cleric’s words are being twisted to say that Mickey should die, that there’s a fatwa on Mickey, that Tom & Jerry are evil. Dude didn’t say that at all. What he said is that, according to Islam, mice are dirty and when found indoors should be killed. He only brought up Mickey to explain how children have become immune to mice because they see them as cute little cartoons rather than dirty, infected rodents. 
Give me a break, FOX and accomplices.
 Report: Saudi Cleric Says Mickey Mouse ‘Must Die’, FOX News, September 16, 2008
The new GOP majority in the U.S. Senate is turning up the heat on its investigation of allegations the Internal Revenue Service shared private taxpayer information with President Obama, demanding Obama turn over communications he and his staff had with the agency.
The Washington Times reported it obtained a copy of a letter signed by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and the 13 other Republicans on the panel.
Addressed to Obama, the letter asks for his communications with the IRS since 2010 for their investigation into whether the agency has been engaging in illegal distribution of private taxpayer information. Republicans have accused the Obama administration of using the IRS as a political weapon since discovering the agency obstructed the applications for tax-exempt status of conservative organizations critical of Obama’s policies.
The letter said: “We have an obligation to conduct oversight of the federal government’s administration of our tax laws. As part of this oversight, we are seeking to determine the degree to and manner in which the Internal Revenue Service shares taxpayer information with the executive office of the president.”
IRS documents filed by the National Organization for Marriage, for example, were released to a citizen who asked for them, and they ended up in the hands of a homosexual activist who posted the confidential information online.
A judge ruled the IRS simply made a mistake, but the agency agreed to pay the group $50,000.
The documents requested by the Senate panel were also requested by the interest group Cause of Action, which has gone to court to try to compel the IRS inspector general to turn them over, the Times reported. The inspector general says it can’t turn over most of the 2,500 pages of records from its investigation because it would violate the privacy of taxpayers.
Texas-based True the Vote and 42 other groups have filed a lawsuit claiming the IRS targeted them based on their beliefs and politics.
Catherine Engelbrecht, founder of True the Vote, said the “notion that the IRS can target Americans for years because of their political beliefs is reprehensible.”
The IRS exacerbated the scandal by repeatedly telling disbelieving congressional investigators that it couldn’t provide relevant emails because of hard-drive failures.
U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton also ordered the agency to find out what happened to the hard drive after IRS Commissioner John Koskinen claimed a computer malfunction had caused the loss of two years of emails belonging to IRS executive Lois Lerner, whose tax-exempt division improperly targeted conservative groups.
Lerner claimed her emails were lost when her hard drive crashed July 13, 2011. She said the crash caused her to lose all her emails sent to recipients outside the IRS from mid-2009 to mid-2011.
David Ferriero, the archivist of the United States for the National Archives and Records Administration, testified the federal agency failed to follow the law in handling Lerner’s emails, raising even more suspicion about their content.
A key House leader addressing the issue, Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., told IRS officials, at a minimum, “You did not tell the whole truth.
The committee accused the IRS of sending the FBI a database containing more than a million pages of confidential taxpayer information.
Officials later said the emails that had been “destroyed” were found, but they were unsorted and details were unavailable.
Robert Wood commented in Forbes: “First, there was no targeting by the IRS. Then there was, but only by those rogue IRS employees down in Cincinnati. … Then, top IRS official Lois Lerner refused to testify. IRS Commissioner Miller seemed defiant too and was sacked. Then, there was a year-long congressional investigation before the IRS finally admitted the 2009 through 2011 Lois Lerner’s emails ‘disappeared.’ Then, the backups … were recycled. Then, the new IRS commissioner said the IRS needs a bigger tech budget.”
Wood said American taxpayers, as well as thousands of dedicated IRS employees, deserve an explanation.
“The vast bulk of them are doing their best and helping not hurting the system. Their position is undermined by the awful bumbling and worse the IRS scandal … has revealed.”
Obama, meanwhile, insisted in an interview there’s “not even a smidgen of corruption” in the IRS.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/gop-senate-te...
The eventual fall of Hillary Clinton is near. Between recordings of her bragging about defending a child rapist to new revelations about her involvement in the Benghazi terror attacks, she’s walking through pretty thick mud these days.
A recent bombshell set of recordings was revealed by The Washington Times that clearly expresses the frustration felt by top officials in the Pentagon about Clinton’s involvement with ousting Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi.
The Citizens Commission on Benghazi , founded by a group of retired generals, admirals, intelligence officers and other top experts, said the recordings support their findings that the Obama White House at one point switched sides in Libya.
Gaddafi was ready to broker a deal with the White House and talk about abdication until then-Secretary of State Clinton and the White House decided to arm Al Qaeda militias and force Gaddafi out of office the dirty way.
Retired Adm. James Lyons, a founding member of the CCB, said, “The release of the Pentagon secret tapes by The Washington Times today validates the CCB interim report that the Libyan war was totally unnecessary, since it now has been validated that Gaddafi was willing to abdicate and that he had no intention of causing a humanitarian crisis, as promoted by Hillary’s State Department.”
Odd "Trick" Restores Your Vision (20/20)
Diabetes Trick Exposed: San Francisco, CA
High Blood Pressure Fixed by Common Food
Sponsored by RevContent
The CCB has been working behind closed doors for nearly two years, conducting their own private investigation of the failures of the Obama White House and Clinton’s State Department that led to the violent attacks in Benghazi, Libya in 2012 (H/T WND).
Another founding member of the group, retired Air Force Gen. Thomas McInerney, thinks that the new rise in radical Islamic attacks stems back to Clinton and the White House’s gross mishandling of Gaddafi’s violent, American-influenced exit.
“It becomes obvious these Pentagon tapes reveal a starting point by the Obama administration to start switching sides by taking down Gaddafi when all informed analysts knew that Benghazi was the incubator for radical Islam in sending suicide bombers to Iraq to kill American troops,” McInerney said.
Members of the commission also spoke of the influence that the Muslim Brotherhood had on the Obama administration and especially Hillary Clinton’s office.
“The war in Libya was a manufactured war produced in part by the influence the Muslim Brotherhood exerted on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, with the Muslim Brotherhood penetrating her office through the influence of Huma Abedin, Clinton’s longtime deputy chief of staff, who transferred to the State Department to serve as Clinton’s aide,” said former CIA specialist Clare Lopez.
The bottom line? There was absolutely no reason we had to go into Libya.
Had Clinton not made her choice based on influence and pressure from the Muslim Brotherhood, Benghazi probably would have never happened.
There is no way this woman deserves to even think about running for president, let alone winning the seat.
In what has been described as a new front in the battle over same-sex marriage, legislators in several states under judicial orders to confer marital status on same-sex couples have introduced bills to forbid state or local officials from issuing marriage licenses to couples of the same gender. The bills would also strip the salaries of employees who issued the licenses, the New York Times reported Thursday.
The bills have been introduced in the legislatures of Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas, with South Carolina also considering a bill that would allow officials to opt out of issuing such licenses if it conflicts with their “sincerely held religious beliefs.” Lawmakers in North Carolina and Utah have bills before them with similar opt-out provisions. And Roy Moore, chief justice of Alabama, has told officials in his state that they need not comply with a federal court order in favor of same-sex marriage in Alabama, in part because “nothing in the United States Constitution grants the federal government the authority to redefine the institution of marriage.”
More than 40 federal court rulings declaring a right to same-sex marriage have been handed down since the Supreme Court in 2012 struck down a provision of the federal Defense of Marriage Act that limited federal marriage benefits to opposite-sex couples only. On the same day, the justices also let stand a lower court decision that California’s ban on same-sex marriage, adopted by voters in a referendum in 2008, was unconstitutional. Last October the high court refused to hear an appeal from rulings requiring five states to grant legal equality between heterosexual and same-sex marriage, thereby increasing the the number of states permitting marriage for same-sex couples at that time from 19 to 24. It has since been made legal in a dozen more states, bringing the total to 36 states and the District of Columbia, encompassing 70 percent of the nation’s population.
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case brought by 15 plaintiffs in four states, appealing a ruling by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati that upheld bans on same-sex marriage in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee. In writing the majority opinion, Judge Jeffrey Sutton said the voters and legislators, not judges, should decide the issue. The Supreme Court has scheduled an extraordinary two-and-a-half hour hearing on the questions of whether the Constitution requires the states to license a marriage between two people of the same sex and, if so, whether states must recognize the same-sex marriages of other states.
Those inquiries bring up a larger question: What provision in the Constitution gives any branch of the federal government — legislative, executive, or judicial — authority to reconstruct the meaning of marriage? The post-Civil War 14th Amendment guarantee that no state “shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of its laws,” was adopted to assure the safety and protection of African-Americans, especially those who had recently been freed from slavery. It surely was never the intention of the Congress that passed it or the states that ratified it to create an authority for the federal judiciary to impose on the laws of every state the peculiar novelty of our own time, namely that a union between two men or two women may be considered a legally valid marriage.
In the senate of South Carolina, Republican Lee Bright is the sponsor of a bill to allow state employees to opt out of issuing marriage licenses on religious grounds, an option he likens to provisions of existing laws that permit healthcare workers to refuse to assist in abortions. It seems likely to pass in a state where 78 percent of the voters in 2006 approved a constitutional amendment affirming marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
Some legal experts predict judges will be offended by state actions that impede their efforts to impose same-sex marriage in states where either voters or their elected representative have rejected it. “I think they’ll be angry,” Risa Goluboff, a law professor at the University of Virginia, told the New York Times. “I think they’ll see this as outright defiance and treat it that way.”
But defiance is sometimes the only way the people in their respective states can attempt to check a federal government that exceeds the authority delegated to it in our Constitution. So argued James Madison and Thomas Jefferson in their writings against the federal Alien and Sedition Acts in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions. After the Supreme Court delivered its Dred Scott decision in 1857, Abraham Lincoln did not call for defiance, but he did suggest that a Supreme Court decision may be subject to ongoing challenges. As he stated in his first Inaugural Address:
I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by all other departments of the Government.... At the same time, the candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their Government into the hands of that eminent tribunal.
The people of 21st century America have largely ceased to be their own rulers, due in no small part to an exaggerated deference to “that eminent tribunal.”
Such measures as are now being considered in a few of our states are a sign that the republican spirit, though long slumbering, is not yet dead.
A 92-year-old woman from Dyersburg, Tennessee recently turned an attempted robbery into an opportunity to minister to the would-be robber. All I can say is #wow
WATCH HER ON THIS VIDEO TELL HER STORY:
Jews News is understandably incensed by a World Tribune report that the Obama administration intervened to block an investigation into alleged Iranian involvement in the murder of 85 men, women and children in a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1994.
“Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman was assassinated for pursuing the truth,” Jews News online service claimed. “Nisman, who had filed a report alleging that Argentine President Cristina Kirchner, Foreign Minister Hector Timerman and other officials had conspired to cover up Iran’s involvement in the massacre, was murdered the night before he was to present his findings to Argentina’s Congress. The Argentine government claimed at first that he had committed suicide. But honest people know that he was murdered — probably by Iranian agents with the collusion of the Argentine police officers who were supposed to protect him.”
Jews News called on American Jews to stop supporting Obama, noting the 74 percent of Jews voted to Obama in his first election bid and somewhat less in this second. Not pulling any punches, the news service blasted Jewish supporters of Obama. “…In the face of Obama’s obvious hostility to Jews and Israel…” it said, “Jews who substitute progressive politics for Judaism invariably become complicit in the persecution of the Jewish people.”
The World Tribune expose comes at a time when Obama is asking Congress and Americans to trust him to negotiate a deal with Iran to prevent its producing nuclear weapons.
The gist of the WT report follows:
The United States pressed Argentina to end its investigation of Iranian complicity in the 1994 bombing of a Jewish center in which nearly 100 people were killed.
Read more at http://dcgazette.com/report-obama-covere...
Your support keeps freedom alive!