Add a rally, forum, town hall, or other event to collect RSVPs, give attendees directions and more.
Add events from your existing Ning or MeetUp groups to share with other FreedomConnector activists.
Let other FreedomConnector activists join your cause to mobilize for freedom!
“Behold a people is coming from the north, and a great nation and great kings shall be aroused from the ends of the earth.” (Jeremiah 50:41)
The Iran Nuclear Deal was signed on July 14, 2015 by the P5+1 – a group comprised of representatives of the governments of the US, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany – and the Islamic Republic of Iran. This date falls during a particularly significant time in the Jewish calendar known as The Three Weeks.
The Three Weeks are a mourning period that the Jewish people observe each year for the destruction of the Holy Temples in Jerusalem. The period starts on the 17th of the Hebrew month of Tammuz and ends on the 9th of the Hebrew month of Av and always falls in the summer. The 9th day of Av, which this year is July 26, is called Tisha B’Av and is the saddest day in the Jewish calendar. It was the day that both Holy Temples were set on fire.
In comparing the deal with Iran to the Munich Agreement between British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and Hitler in 1938, world-renowned lecturer Rabbi Lazer Brody wrote: “Now, 77 years later, during the notorious ‘Three Weeks’ between the 17th of Tammuz and Tisha B’Av, the USA has reaffirmed its commitment to hedonism by appeasing Iran and signing a nuclear agreement that is not worth the skin of a garlic clove.”
In an email dated July 16, 2015 and sent to his “Letter from Jerusalem” subscribers, Rabbi Avraham Greenbaum, Founder and Director of AZAMRA, an international organization that promotes Torah teachings to all nations, echoes Rabbi Brody’s thoughts about the timing.
“The carefully choreographed timing of the announcement after so many delays could not have been more significant from the Jewish point of view, given that it fell on July 14 / 27 Tammuz, bang in the middle of the ‘Three Weeks’ period from the Fast of 17 Tammuz (4 July) until the Fast of Tisha B’Av (26 July), when we soul-searchingly contemplate our collective past, our present and our future destiny,” he wrote.
Although the White House is attempting to push the agreement through the United Nations before Congress has had a chance to review the measure, there is another striking connection between the Iran nuclear deal and the Jewish calendar.
Regardless of what happens at the UN, the US Congress has 60 days to review and vote to either ratify or nix the nuclear deal. On the Jewish calendar, 60 days from the day the Iran nuclear deal was signed falls on Rosh Hashana, the Jewish New Year. Thus, the final decision will likely be announced in the period between the Jewish holidays of Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur known as the Ten Days of Repentance. These are days of judgement for the Jewish people.
Speaking to the confluence of this decision and the Jewish calendar, End of Times author Rabbi Pinchas Winston told Breaking Israel News, “The [Talmud says] that all punishment comes to the world because of the Jewish people. Sometimes it means the Jewish people are not up to snuff, but other times it means that we did not care enough to use our spiritual gifts, such as Torah learning and prayer, to save a situation. When important decisions ‘hang in the air’ for a time, it is Heaven’s way of giving the Jewish people a chance to use those gifts to get history back on track. The fact that the Iran deal was made during the Three Weeks and will be decided on by Rosh Hashanah should make it clear where our responsibility lies. We don’t want this ‘punishment’ to occur and we certainly don’t want to be responsible for it.”
When questioned further, Rabbi Winston affirmed, “Now we have a chance to interfere with it [the nuclear deal] by praying and doing mitzvos [God’s commandments].”
Rabbi Nachman Kahana, an orthodox rabbinic scholar, offers comfort to believers who sense a connection between the Iranian nuclear deal and the End of Days. He cites the Yalkut Shimoni, a 16th century rabbinic commentary on the Bible, which describes the current situation prophetically.
“The Yalkut states that Paras (Persia-Iran) will be the dread of humanity. The world’s leaders will be frustrated in their futile efforts to save what they can. The people of Yisrael will also be petrified by the impending danger,” he wrote. “And HaShem [God] will say to us, ‘Why are you afraid? All of this I have done in order to bring you the awaited redemption. And this redemption will not be like the redemption from Egypt, which was followed by suffering. This redemption will be absolute, followed with peace.’”
Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/45436/...
This next article really hits home, here, on FC. The Founders words:
"to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them" and,
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
...in light of the Declaration, it creates and establishes a very high standard for, not just the United States but, all nations.
So, evidently, humanity is all equal in God's eyes, that is, we're all 'unrighteous', individually, without Jesus.
Chris Matthews vs. Debbie Wasserman Schultz: "What's The Difference Between A Democrat And A Socialist?"
I heard this clip this morning on the news and it created another question which I believe any real thinker does so. As I was taught, the problem and benefit of finding answer is they only create more questions.
So what's the basic or end result difference between as socialist and a fascist?
Socialist says, creates laws or regulates business not to make it, virtually controlling business while telling the people they are free. The socialist takes from the people and distributes to those people they feel deserve it.
Fascist says, creates laws or regulates people so they will not purchase it while telling business they are free to make it. The fascist takes from the people and distributes to the businesses they feel deserve it.
What do you get when you have a mixed socialist/fascist society? The socialist and fascist debate and fight over the money they take from the people as to which people and businesses will get our hard earned money for doing nothing.
Anything to add? :-)
And here's an introduction to the book:
"A Beautiful Delusion The Coming Anti-Christ"
Authored by William Kinney
Hidden in the Hebrew scriptures is evidence that Adam and Eve were immortal and covered in light, just as God uses light as a covering for himself (Psalm 104:2). They were more than two unique individuals, their bodies represented a plane of existence that was an integral part of the fabric of Creation. The sin they committed changed their physiology, and they became mortal. Because of their mortality; "God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife, and clothed them." Gen 3:21
When God made these coverings of skin, did He slaughter animals, skin them, tan their hides, make thread, and then sew together some buckskin clothing? Or, does the term "coverings of skin" refer to the epidermal, or outer layers of human skin. Skin that was added because without their covering of light they could not exist as mortals in the natural world. Their offense was not only against God, it was against their own bodies, and they altered their DNA.
How else can we explain the fact that through heredity, we have shared in the penalty for their sins? The story of creation, the fall, redemption, and the coming anti-Christ; is all linked to the body and specifically - DNA.
In 2000, I read an interview "Reader's Digest magazine" did with Dr. Francis Crick. (He and Dr. Watson are credited with discovering the double helix structure of DNA). At the time, the Human Genome project was underway. Dr. Crick was asked about how many genes they had identified so far. He answered, 140,000, and we expect to find 4,000 more. I almost fell out of my chair.
How could anyone miss the significance of that number?
This immediately changed my perception of certain scripture. In Revelation, 144,000 are sealed with the seal of God, (in their foreheads). 144,000 stand on Mount Zion with Christ, having the name of God written in their foreheads.
What if this number, instead of referring to a number of individuals, actually refers to the immortal life genome?
In other words, to be "sealed" by God is to have your genetic code supernaturally sequenced back to an immortal state. Since the human body, (and its homeostasis), is a closed system, Adam and Eve did not destroy the genes that enable immortal life, they reorganized the sequence. This proprietary information was not annihilated, it was merely suppressed.
"Life Extension Magazine" interviewed Dr. Michael D. West about a breakthrough published in the journal "Regenerative Medicine." He said (regarding immortality):
"The goal of gerontology, for many years, has been to find the reason that our reproductive lineage continues to make babies, generation after generation, while the other cells in our body, [called somatic cells], have a finite life span, and are mortal,...The answer is that we come from a lineage of cells that have been proliferating since the dawn of life on earth. The cells that made us have no dead ancestors."
We come from immortality, and much of the genetic research performed today is focused on immortality..." [end of excerpt].
I STRONGLY recommend this Book. It will bring to life the significant description of the "Nacash", [translated "serpent"] as being: "...the most subtle beast in the field". [SUBTLE: "hard to be discerned"]...Bill helps us better appreciate the subtle nature of the "beast" by his numbers we expect to encounter in relation to his coming as the Anti-Christ...666, & 144,000.
I was once warned by a very Godly gentleman: "The closer we get to the end, the more we'll realize we've not understood the Scriptures correctly".
Bill Kinney does a inspiring job revealing why that's true! Using Scripture, and modern Science, recent developments in Scientific research, and daily events. Enjoy!
While visiting Kenya Barack Obama publicly lectured Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta about gay rights yesterday. I didn’t know that we were sending our president halfway around the world to promote the gay & lesbian agenda! Samaritan's Purse has an office in Kenya and has worked there many years, and I can tell you that the churches in Kenya know what the Bible says about homosexuality—it is a sin.
While visiting Kenya Barack Obama publicly lectured Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta about gay rights yesterday. I didn’t know that we were sending our president halfway around the world to promote the gay & lesbian agenda! Samaritan's Purse has an office in Kenya and has worked there many years, and I can tell you that the churches in Kenya know what the Bible says about homosexuality—it is a sin. Sin should not be embraced, but recognized truthfully for what it is and for its serious consequences. God’s Word says, “the wages of sin is death.” Thankfully though, sin does have a remedy—forgiveness is available through repentance and faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. As a world leader, the United States of America is now exporting the acceptance of immorality via our president. What will the cost of that be?
(posted on FB by F. Graham)
I’ve long awaited a class of politicians who would not only look the media in the eye, but openly rebuke and defy them. I’ve awaited a class of politicians who weren’t burdened by the protocol and decorum of political interactions. I call them “The Aggressives.”
Over the last decade and a half, we’ve seen Republican after Republican use the same tired language: We have to reach across the aisle. We have to compromise. We must be congenial. All of these things are considered virtues by the established political class in Washington. But why are they held in such high esteem? Because they keep the waters calm. The phrase “go along to get along” is often used to describe these types of men and women in politics; those who defer to the alleged virtues of compromise and congeniality.
But compromise and congeniality are not what they seem. First, one need not be rude to express a difference of opinion–even a severe one. The notion that congeniality requires a watering down of one’s beliefs is ludicrous. Second, compromise cannot be attained if the ideas being debated are diametrically opposed. Compromise is like a smartphone: everyone has one, but the average person has no clue how they really work. Everyone extols the virtues of compromise, but when asked to delve more deeply into what constitutes that idea, no one really knows.
People see the middle-ground as kind. Both sides meeting half way, giving up portions of their argument for the benefit of the whole—but that’s not what compromise means in Washington. Compromise means one side—the left—getting everything they want, leaving Republicans dumbfounded as to how the rug was pulled out.
Republicans are morons, generally speaking. Election after election, we’ve sent watered-down politicians to fight the Goliaths of the left. In this way, I admire the left tremendously. They don’t water down their beliefs; they hold firm and press forward. And it works.
John McCain, Mitt Romney, Bob Dole, even George W. Bush (though he won), were candidates who valued calm waters over truth and reality. Bush in particular demonstrated this tendency. Though there were times when he stood firm, there were also numerous instances in which he would behave exactly as the left would have, had they been in control.
These politicians, including President Bush, have aided and abetted the advance of democratic socialism in the United States. We are not a capitalist society; we are a society in which the government chooses winners and losers. Sure, the Democrats have been the drivers of this transformation, but Republicans have done nothing to stop it. In most cases, they’ve even fostered the climate of a mother government.
That is why it is vitally important this election that we embrace the Aggressives, the candidates who will look us in the eye, and tell us the truth for once. Ted Cruz, Carly Fiorina—and yes—Donald Trump are the three candidates who I see as the most important going into 2016. Cruz and Fiorina have gone on extreme offense in a way that nearly every other candidate has been unwilling to do. They have made waves in the calm waters of Washington. They simply speak what they believe to be reality. This is why they are so hated by Washington.
Donald Trump, for all his faults, has taken a hammer to the glass jaw of Washington politics as usual. If Cruz and Fiorina are making waves, Trump is creating tsunamis. And conservatives are responding to it. Conservatives are hungry for the person who will tell them the truth and never apologize for it, even if it offends. Trump is that man. Though I wouldn’t want him as POTUS for multiple reasons, I am extremely grateful he’s in the race because he’s forcing the debate into territory which has previously been uncharted.
No one would dare to be as blunt as Trump regarding illegal immigration, but when he spoke about the issue, he set fire to latent gasoline. Americans whose sons and daughters had been murdered at the hands of illegal alien criminals spoke out and thanked Trump. His polls skyrocketed. He is the leader of the Aggressives.
I’m tired of slick; I’m tired of polished; I’m tired of rehearsed. I want real. Trump is real. Cruz is real. Fiorina is real. Reality is the name of the game this election cycle, and it will disrupt Washington in a way that hasn’t been seen in our history.
We need disruption. Without it, the water will remain calm. If we get a Bush, or a Graham, we will lose. Pastels are ugly and hard to get excited about; bold colors are beautiful and vibrant.
The Aggressives have brought a new set of rules into the game, and if they continue to make waves, we may finally get something accomplished. Donald Trump will likely burn bright, then burn out—as he is a political neophyte in the worst way—however, what he can accomplish while his light is shining could be tremendous. He can lead the way for the likes of Cruz and Fiorina to speak even more boldly and with a potency that will resonate with voters across the country.
For twenty years, Republicans have played by the Washington rules and lost. It’s time for the Aggressives to take charge, change the rules, and take the presidency.
Does Obama Want Iran to Nuke Israel?
Your support keeps freedom alive!