Add a rally, forum, town hall, or other event to collect RSVPs, give attendees directions and more.
Add events from your existing Ning or MeetUp groups to share with other FreedomConnector activists.
Let other FreedomConnector activists join your cause to mobilize for freedom!
VOTE NOW: What should Republicans' Top Legislative Priority Be?
Repeal the ObamaCare individual mandate
Stop the NSA's warrantless spying on Americans
Refuse to reauthorize the Import-Export Bank
Stop the ObamaCare bailouts of insurance companies
View poll and comments »
So Mitch McConnell says they don't have the votes to stop the Obama treaty with Iran, Bullshit, Some Democrats are still not voting for it and their is no fight left in these cowards. But you don't care what we the people think, And you still have your seats in the Senate and House. But this time your lies and cowardice been levied against God and the only Nation in the middle east that is truly an ally.
So Mitch McConnell says they don't have the votes to stop the Obama treaty with Iran, Bullshit, Some Democrats are still not voting for it and their is no fight left in these cowards. But you don't care what we the people think, And you still have your seats in the Senate and House. But this time your lies and cowardice been levied against God and the only Nation in the middle east that is truly an ally. You have told God Israel no longer matters and you should be very afraid, Because the Lords anger will eventually bring you down. So enjoy while you can Rhino's, Hell is coming to get you!!.
Fred Reed (born 1945 in Crumpler, West Virginia) is a writer and was formerly a technology columnist for The Washington Times.
A former Marine and Vietnam War veteran, Reed is a police writer and an occasional war correspondent. He currently writes weekly columns for the website Fred on Everything. His work is often satirical and opinionated.
Reed notes that his columns are often provocative and calls himself, "an equal-opportunity irritant." His output does not fit into conventional political classification (although he does embody many libertarian philosophies); it includes attacks on feminism (generally the province of the left), George W. Bush (generally the province of the right), Israel (though not of Jews in general) and evolution (generally the province of religious fundamentalists).
Many of Reed's articles speak of a yearning for a simpler time and urge the reader to forgo the pursuit of money and comforts in favor of a cultured life of the mind. Reed currently lives in Mexico.
Black Power: A Done Deal
By Fred Reed, October 30, 2014
It is curious that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity, should dominate national politics. Yet they do. Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or can't do. Their power seems without limit.
Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress, rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as must be examinations for promotion in fire departments, the military, and police forces. Blacks must be admitted to universities for which they are not remotely qualified, where departments of Black Studies must be established to please them. Corporate work forces, federal departments, and elite high-schools must be judged not on whether they perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of blacks.
Do laws requiring identification to vote threaten to end multiple or illegal voting? The laws must go. Do blacks not like Confederate flags? Adieu, flags. Does Huckleberry Finn go down the Mississippi with the N****r Jim, or did Conrad write The N****r of the Narcissus? These must be banned or expurgated to please blacks who haven't read them or, usually, heard of them. Do we want to prevent people coming from regions infested with Ebola from entering the United States? We cannot. It would offend blacks.
We must never, ever say or do anything that might upset them - as virtually everything does. It is positively astonishing. One expects the rich and smart to have disproportionate power. But America is dominated from the slums. One might think that a single set of laws should and would apply to all citizens, and that things should be done without regard to race, creed, color, sex, or national origin, and that all should have the same rights and responsibilities. It is, sadly, not so.
The dominance of the media by blacks is impressive.
If a white shoots a black to defend himself, it becomes national news for weeks, or months, and riots follow. But when blacks engage in their unending racial attacks on whites, the media demurely look the other way. The attackers are never black. They are "teens." Reporters who say otherwise are likely to be fired. In effect, the thirteen percent censor the national press.
Much of their mastery has become so deeply engrained as no longer to be noticed. There is the DC Hesitation. In the bars and restaurants of Washington, a man weary of an incompetent affirmative-action hire in his office will, before commenting to a friend, lean forward, lower his voice, and look furtively over both shoulders to see whether anyone might overhear: The DC Hesitation. People don't even know that they are doing this.
Defensive behavior by whites has become nearly universal. A sort of Masonic recognition-ritual occurs among white people recently introduced in social gatherings. Is the other person, for want of better terms, a liberal or a realist? Dare one speak? One of them will say something mildly skeptical about, say, Jesse Jackson. The other rolls his eyes in shared disgust. The secret handshake. Or, if the listener is politically correct, the bait is not taken. In either case, blacks dominate political conversation.
So extreme is the power to control speech and even thought, that politicians have to avoid mentioning watermelons, or that neighborhoods of high crime must delicately be called "sketchy" instead of "black," though all understand who lives there and what is meant. The avoidance of racial reference is not an even-handed if despotic attempt to oppose racism since, as we all know, blacks freely apply any derogatory wording they choose to whites. In short, they rule. Which is amazing.
The dominance extends to children. When in junior high one of my daughters brought home a science handout with common chemical terms badly misspelled in a way which suggested a particular speech pattern. "Is your teacher black?" I said without thinking. "Daaaaaaady!" she said in anguish, having made the connection but knowing that she shouldn't have. Blacks control what you can say to your own children in your own home. And of course if I had gone to the school and demanded that the teacher be fired, it would have been evidence of my depravity and probable KKK membership.
The word "unbelievable" has lost all force. Things that ought to be unbelievable, and once were, have become routine. Still, there it was: Don't expect a junior-high teacher to have the level of literacy I had in the fourth grade. Instead, make it dangerous to notice their stupidity.
This is not new, and it hasn't changed. In 1981, in a piece for Harper's, I wrote:
"The bald, statistically verifiable truth is that the teachers' colleges, probably on ideological grounds, have produced an incredible proportion of incompetent black teachers. Evidence of this appears periodically, as, for example, in the results of a competency test given to applicants for teaching positions in Pinellas County, Florida, cited in Time, June 16, 1980. To pass this grueling examination, an applicant had to be able to read at the tenth-grade level and do arithmetic at the eighth-grade level. Though they all held B.A.'s, 25 percent of the whites and 79 percent of the blacks failed. Similar statistics exist for other places."
Nothing has changed. Blacks now control the presidency and thus, most importantly, the Attorney Generalship. In this the staggering political power of blacks is most evident. Obama was elected because he was black: an equally unqualified and negligible white politician would have had no chance. He is now fiercely pushing the most profound transformation of America ever attempted, by opening the floodgates to immigration from the south. To effect this end he apparently will simply ignore Congress and the Constitution. The people will not be consulted. Laws will be ignored.
It is hard to imagine why he does it except from racism, from a desire to get even with whites by enrolling their country in the Third World. A short-sighted policy, yes, since Hispanics do not like blacks and will soon be more powerful-but that will come a bit later.
Note that self-inflicted problems of blacks consume inordinate amounts of public and governmental attention, even though only blacks can solve them. I might say, "should solve them," since they never have and we all know they seem to have no desire to do so. Yet we hear about them endlessly.
Are blacks in Chicago killing each other in large numbers? The solution might be to stop doing it, might it not? While I do not wish these young dead, I can do nothing to stop them, and it is not a problem I can solve.
Are black children growing up illiterate? This gives me no pleasure, and I have various reasons both selfish and moral to wish it were not so. But perhaps the solution is for their parents, or parent, to see that they do their homework, or even to teach them. I cannot do this for them, and again it isn't my problem to resolve.
Why do I have to hear, endlessly, about the "achievement gap?" Whether of genetic or cultural origin, it seems as immutable as Avogadro's number, and I can do nothing about it. I raise my children. They need to raise theirs. They rule. It is astonishing.
Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis has been under fire from the sodomite community over her refusal to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and she has refused to step down from her position as county clerk. Now it appears that the sodomites are attempting to pressure her by pushing for a contempt of court charge, but David isn't going to be bullied.
A motion was filed Tuesday, asking U.S. District Judge David Bunning to hold Davis in contempt. Bunning scheduled a contempt hearing for 11 a.m. Thursday in Ashland. At that time, the gay couples will have to present evidence, which could include testimony from Davis herself. Bunning would then decide on punishment. That could include fines, jail time or both, but the motion asks the judge to impose only financial penalties.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to intervene in the case, leaving Davis no legal grounds to refuse to grant licenses to gay couples.
Tuesday's court maneuver comes after Davis refused to process marriage licenses.
Davis showed up for work just after 7 a.m. Tuesday and, about an hour later, she denied a couple that sought a marriage license.
Two couples, who are engaged in sodomy, came in attempting to get licenses. April Miller and Karen Roberts brought in the cameras of the media, but were refused licenses. David Moore and David Ermold were rejected for a fourth time and they were refused the opportunity to speak to Davis.
"Tell her to come out and face the people she's discriminating against," Ermold shouted.
Davis appeared from her office only to be blasted by these effeminate sodomites, even though she clearly and politely spoke to them and claimed that she has not disrespected them.
Ermold said, "I would never do what you are doing to us to someone."
"You believe passionately about something as do I," Davis told him.
Ermold then said, "We aren't leaving without a license," to which Davis told him, "Then you're going to have a long day." Indeed, hours after her statement, reporter Hillary Thornton posted this:
See? Sodomites continue to this day to weary themselves in an attempt to find the door to engage in their deviant passions (Gen. 19:11).
Davis was told that her temporary stay was up. However, she reminded those engaging in their unlawful behavior the she had many appeals ahead.
"We aren't giving licenses today pending appeals process," Davis said.
When asked by whose authority she was not issuing marriage licenses to sodomites, Davis looked the camera in the eye and declared, "Under God's authority."
The effeminate sodomite then attempted more bullying claiming that he paid her salary and was being discriminated against. He then stepped in it by asking Davis if she would provide licenses to interracial couples, which she affirmed she would, provided they were a man and a woman.
She then went to call the police and the sodomites said that they would seek to have the police arrest her. Arrest her? For what? Standing for the law, not lawlessness?
Sadly, Kentucky has deviated from law and attempted to rewrite sodomy as "rape." Why would they do this? One can only guess that there are sodomites and sodomite sympathizers in the Kentucky legislature. But sodomy is clearly defined in Webster's 1828 Dictionary
as a "crime against nature," which would have been understood in the context of Romans 1:24-27:
Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
America, do you see why these people are lawless? They are unrepentant and they want to force others to accept and normalize their deviant behavior, just like the Communists designed. Do you see why when you do not deal with the crime of sodomy in the manner that Scripture demands (and as our state laws had formerly upheld, and many still have on the books today) that all you do is encourage their lawlessness and the lawlessness of those around them? After all, sodomy is not a victimless crime. Think long and hard about that because it would not surprise me if these sodomites go from what you see in the video to physical attacks on Ms. Davis.
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/09/rowan-...
I know that you people have read the Bible, that’s a given. Most people nowadays are only taught from the New Testament. Do you remember reading that GOD told Moses and us in the Old Testament that He would send us a prophet that would speak His Word only? Sure you do, but here is a reminder. This is another reminder that God will always keep His promises.
15 The Lord thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken; 16 According to all that thou desiredst of the Lord thy God in Horeb in the day of the assembly, saying, Let me not hear again the voice of the Lord my God, neither let me see this great fire any more, that I die not. 17 And the Lord said unto me, They have well spoken that which they have spoken. 18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. 19 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him. 20 But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die. 21 And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken? 22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.
It is here promised concerning Christ, that there should come a Prophet, great above all the prophets; by whom God would make known himself and his will to the children of men, more fully and clearly than he had ever done before. He is the Light of the world, John 8:12. He is the World by whom God speaks to us,John 1:1; Hebrews 1:2. In his birth he should be one of their nation. In his resurrection he should be raised up at Jerusalem, and from thence his doctrine should go forth to all the world. Thus God, having raised up his Son Christ Jesus, sent him to bless us. He should be like unto Moses, only above him. This prophet is come, even JESUS; and is "He that should come," and we are to look for no other. The view of God which he gives, will not terrify or overwhelm, but encourages us. He speaks with fatherly affection and Divine authority united. Whoever refuses to listen to Jesus Christ, shall find it is at his peril; the same that is the Prophet is to be his Judge, John 12:48. Woe then to those who refuse to hearken to His voice, to accept His salvation, or yield obedience to His sway! But happy they who trust in Him, and obey Him. He will lead them in the paths of safety and peace, until He brings them to the land of perfect light, purity, and happiness. Here is a caution against false prophets. It highly concerns us to have a right touchstone wherewith to try the word we hear, that we may know what that word is which the Lord has not spoken. Whatever is against the plain sense of the written word, or which gives countenance or encouragement to sin, we may be sure is not that which the Lord has spoken.
America is supposed to be a place where everyone is protected by the same rights. People have the right to speak out when they think that there is an injustice. These people, no matter what they are protesting or speaking against, are afforded the protection of the law. It is their right to voice their disdain for what they believe is unlawful and even tyrannical.
America is supposed to be a place where everyone is protected by the same rights. People have the right to speak out when they think that there is an injustice. These people, no matter what they are protesting or speaking against, are afforded the protection of the law. It is their right to voice their disdain for what they believe is unlawful and even tyrannical. We should all expect the freedom to speak about any subject and that right not be infringed either physically or through censorship. One would think that when this right is infringed by others, it would make the news. Well, you would be wrong.
Christian News reports:
At least six Christians were attacked with a cleansing agent on Wednesday while preaching the gospel and standing for life outside of a Planned Parenthood facility in Portland, Oregon, but the man who committed with the act was not arrested and was let go without charges.
The pro-life outreach was part of the Biblical Church Evangelism Conference hosted by Beaverton Grace Bible Church and organized by its pastor, Chuck O'Neal.
Now this attack occurred over two weeks ago, but not a peep from the mainstream media, not one word by those who claim to be the watchmen of our liberties. Fox, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, nor any other cable news show broke the story. Even with Planned Parenthood's almost daily attention, not a peep. And this was almost the same reaction the victims received from the police.
Christian News continues:
A police patrol vehicle was parked nearby as the incident took place, and former Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff Tony Miano began calling to the officer to arrest the man. However, Miano and O'Neal state that the officer, Gene Gillock, rather protected the man shaking the cleanser on the Christians.
"As I'm shouting to him, 'We want this man arrested,' he's telling us to stay back and not to disrupt what he's doing, while he's letting the assailant [be] who just assaulted six Christians with a white powder," Miano explained. "He's treating the guy who assaulted six of our friends as if they had been doing something wrong."
As the man assaulted these peaceful protesters, the police officer acts like the Christians were the ones in the wrong; as if the Christians had done something to provoke the man and his outburst of anger. Officer Gillock then ignored the people doused in the harsh cleanser and turned his attention to the attacker; the officer escorting him home, as if he needed protection. And this leads to some further speculation about the event.
Christian News adds:
Miano further outlined that he believes that the outcome would have been much different had the perpetrator and victim roles been reversed.
"Can you imagine if we had thrown something on someone at Planned Parenthood?" he asked, noting that none in the group would ever do so. "We would be called American Jihadists; it would have been all over the news, … they would accuse us of wanting to kill abortionists [and] hating women. And Officer Gillock would have had us all on the ground in handcuffs, and we would have all gone to jail."
Now, that would likely be all over every channel on a thirty-minute loop. Guaranteed!
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/09/six-ch...
Your support keeps freedom alive!